POZ - News : Another Peace Corps Volunteer Dismissed for Being HIV-Positive
Subscribe to:
POZ magazine E-newsletters
POZ Personals Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Back to home » News » May 2008

Special Reports

Moving the Needle on Syringe Exchange

Farewell, Florent

Hormonally Challenged

» More

Most Talked About

AIDS: Not a Heterosexual Disease? (46)

The Greatest Gay Rights Battle of Our Time (Blog) (19)

Lambda Legal Responds to HIV Spitting Conviction (19)

Ready to Quit? The Risks and Rewards of a Potent Smoking-Cessation Drug (17)

Mandatory HIV Tests Before Marriage? (15)

Most Popular Lessons

Herpes Simplex Virus

Syphilis & Neurosyphilis

Shingles

The HIV Life Cycle

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)

Treatments for Opportunistic Infections (OIs)

10 Years Ago In POZ

More News

Click here for more news

Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.


emailrssprint

May 16, 2008

Another Peace Corps Volunteer Dismissed for Being HIV-Positive

In January, the Peace Corps dismissed volunteer Jeremiah S. Johnson, 25, after he tested HIV-positive during his service in the Ukraine. Along with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Johnson is working to bring legal action against the Peace Corps; at the time of his ouster, the corps stated that he was the first volunteer to be diagnosed with the virus. But in the May 16 edition of The Washington Post, reporter Stephen Barr reveals that of the 75,000 Americans who have joined the Peace Corps since 1989, 36 have tested positive either during or at the conclusion of their overseas tours (washingtonpost.com, 5/16).

According to the article, one of these volunteers, Rebecca M. Coulborn—who was serving in the sub-Saharan nation of Burkina Faso—was removed from service in 2001, within 48 hours of her diagnosis. “I was told that was Peace Corps policy,” she said. “If you did test HIV-positive, you were medically separated from the Peace Corps.”

The story notes that volunteers who develop any medical condition that cannot be resolved within 45 days are medically separated from the rest of the corps. However, in response to the outcry over Johnson’s removal, the Peace Corps says it will reevaluate its policy.

“The Peace Corps is now committed to extending the individualized assessments in these types of cases to include whether a newly infected volunteer could be reasonably accommodated and either kept at post or sent to another post in lieu of medical separation,” the organization wrote in a letter to the ACLU. “We cannot commit to a guarantee of reassignment.”

Search: Peace Corps, Jeremiah S. Johnson, Rebecca M. Coulborn


Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailrssprint


Name: (2-50 characters)
Email: (will not show)
City: (optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

  comments 1 - 3 (of 3 total)    

Andrew Scott, Bronx, 2008-05-23 08:25:10
Poz obviously does not understand much about the conditions in countries where the Peace Corps sends volunteers. When I served in West Africa 20 years ago I cam does with all kinds of tropical illnesses including hook worm, round work, tape worm, Amoebic dysentery, and malaria (on almost a monthly basis)to name a few. The medical care was was basic. In a place like Burkina Faso there are few facilities if any to do blood tests that would be routine in the US.

Mary Mutale, Lusaka, 2008-05-21 06:25:22
It is dissappointing for an Organ like Peace Corps to put up such discriminatory rules. HIV is not a disease but a condition which can be monitored and controlled. It is a shame on this Organ, I thought such Organs are suppose to uphold human rights and live to promote human diginity. Such Organs are not even supposed to be in existence because they tend to frustrate, humiliate, and above all bring down people's calling to render services to others despite their health status -shame on you.

Michael, , 2008-05-20 22:01:32
I would hope that they would review their policy. They also need more and better education on the HIV diease, and learn to be thankful that those who test positive would still want to volunteer their time to help their organization out. They should only let those go if they asked to be released from any contract they might have signed up for.

comments 1 - 3 (of 3 total)    


[Go to top]

Get Started
Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS

Talk to Us
Weekly Poll
Question: Do you believe that teachers and school administration need to know if any of their students are HIV positive?
Yes
No

Monthly Poll
Question: Which of the following best explains why the AIDS epidemic is disproportionately affecting the African-American community?
Early prevention campaigns were geared toward gay white men
Since HIV is considered manageable, people are less concerned about contracting it
A history of social inequality--institutionalized racism, sexism, classism and homophobia
African Americans' disproportionate access to health care and treatment
Denial/stigma around HIV/AIDS
Mainstream hip-hop's lyrics that perpetuate a culture of unprotected sex and disrespect of women.

Surveys
Do you think shopping for HIV-related products is a form of activism?

How do you see America's place in the global AIDS epidemic?

more surveys  
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy