Subscribe to:
POZ magazine E-newsletters
POZ Personals Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Women's Hub News
 

Back to home » News & Views » Special Reports


 

November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
June 2006

emailrssprint

January 4, 2008

AIDS Activists Call On Global Health Organizations to Revise Their Global Health Plan

This past November, the leaders of eight international health organizations—the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; the GAVI Alliance; the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; UNAIDS; the UN Population Fund; UNICEF; the World Health Organization and the World Bank—released Scaling Up for Better Health, a joint plan intended to show health care agencies around the world how to improve their quality of care. At first read, the plan seemed to be one that should be supported by those supporting people living with HIV/AIDS around the world. However, a closer read of the plan’s final draft prompted the International Treatment Preparedness Coalition (ITPC)—endorsed by AIDS activists, health experts and human rights advocates around the world—to write a letter to the heads of the eight health organizations to express fear that the proposed plan might have been inspired by recent public commentary that the world is spending too much money to fight AIDS.

The letter states: “At face value, the Scaling Up for Better Health plan, which is in fact a cluster of recent global health initiatives encompassing Germany's Providing for Health, Canada's Catalytic Initiative to Save a Million Lives, the United Kingdom’s International Health Partnership, and Norway’s Deliver Now for Women and Children; and which has recently been endorsed by all of you, could only make us happy. However, when reading the final draft note of November 1, 2007, combined with our experience in developing countries, we fear that this new initiative might undermine some existing efforts to realize the right to health. In particular we fear that this new initiative might be inspired by recent public comments, according to which the world is spending too much on the fight against AIDS. If this were the intention, we could certainly not support this initiative. The world is not spending enough on the fight against AIDS and the world is not spending enough fighting against other health crises and problems. Only if this is explicitly acknowledged as the foundation of the Scaling Up for Better Health plan, we would be willing to support this plan.”

The letter then spells out several key conditions that must be met before the ITPC will support the plan. These conditions include: the plan’s recognizing that health is a human right; the adoption of a sustainable health care aide system that operates on an uninterrupted basis; the acknowledgement of the importance of the right to health above macroeconomic concerns; an allowance for appropriate responses to health crises; a balanced approach to the integration of “vertical,” or disease-specific, health interventions; a transparent overview of contributions and grants; and a push to ensure that civil society is included in all stages of the plan’s decision-making processes.

“We are the consumers (and often providers) of health care, we have a vested interest in seeing programs succeed in reaching their goals,” the ITPC letter concludes. “We are able to provide an independent voice from our countries’ villages to our nations’ capitals describing what we need in real terms and what is and isn’t working on the ground. We are willing to work together, but our conditions for collaboration are clear.”

POZ asked Gregg Gonsalves, a well-known international AIDS activist currently with the AIDS and Rights Alliance for Southern Africa in Capetown, also a signatory of the letter, why he feels the letter was sent. “We sent [it] because several major funders of AIDS programs are considering moving away from disease-specific funding, and these policy changes are imminent,” he said.


NEW! Scroll down to comment on this story.

emailrssprint

Name:

(will display; 2-50 characters)

Email:

(will NOT display)

City:

(will display; optional)

Comment (500 characters left):

(Note: The POZ team review all comments before they are posted. Please do not include either ":" or "@" in your comment.)

| Posting Rules

Previous Comments:

         


[Go to top]


Get Answers
What to do if you've just been diagnosed
How to find a support system
Things you should know before starting treatment
How to handle side effects and other concerns
How to tell someone you have HIV/AIDS

Blogs by HIV+ Women
Regan Ann Michelle Annette

Read the blogs
Woman of the Month
Beth Benne: Nursing HIV Awareness
Beth Benne, RN, is HIV negative, but the virus has impacted her life. She currently supervises a biannual HIV/AIDS awareness week as the director of the student health center at Pierce College, a community commuter school in Woodland Hills, California. 


Woman of the Month is supported by exclusive advertising from Gilead.
Overheard in the Women's Forum
"I think that it's OK to be angry. I am sometimes—it's natural—we are HIV positive. but I always try to not let myself stay there too long. Let yourself feel you are human. You should not beat yourself up about being angry."

from Positive Women


Join the forums

Smart + Strong Network
POZ Magazine
POZ Personals
POZ Mentor
POZ ASO Directory
AIDSmeds
Real Health Magazine
TuSalud Magazine
ComboCards
Rx Info Cards
Also visit POZ on...
Facebook

MySpace

YouTube

 
[ about Smart + Strong | about POZ | POZ advisory board | partner links | advertise/contact us | site map]
© 2008 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy