NEW! If you don't understand one of the words in this article,
just double-click it.
A window will open with a definition from CancerWEB's On-line Medical Dictionary. If the double-click feature
doesn't work in your browser, you can enter the word below:
Have news about HIV? Send press releases, news tips and other announcements to news@poz.com.
May 22, 2008
HIV Infection Often Results From Single Copy of Virus in Cell
While such sexually transmitted diseases as gonorrhea and syphilis invade the body with as many as 10, 20, 100 or 200 bacteria, , scientists from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) have found that most HIV infections are the result of a single copy of the virus penetrating the body’s defenses, The Birmingham News reports (al.com, 5/20).
“In the vast majority of cases a single virus has gone across the sexual mucosa, and that virus has infected a cell,” said George M. Shaw, lead author on the UAB study published online on Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science. “That cell then makes a lot of virus. Now you just have a firestorm of HIV replication in the next couple [of] weeks. Very quickly the person is populated by millions of viruses.”
In addition to breaking new ground in understanding the HIV transmission process, this study also showed why condoms are so effective in preventing infection and why efforts to develop viable microbicide gels have proven less so. Shaw told The Birmingham News that unlike microbicides studied thus far—which may not stop all individual viruses from entering the body—a properly used condom stops all of them.
Scroll down to comment on this story.
Please click OK to confirm your comment and confirm you accept our posting rules. Note your message will be reviewed by our staff before going live.
Previous Comments:
comments 1 - 2 (of 2 total)
Priscilla Alexander, New York, 2008-05-28 16:35:24
If true, it is pretty daunting. And it does suggest why all the microbicides have failed so far.
Alan, Phoenix, 2008-05-28 01:46:27
Yet another study being heralded and interpreted by media folks who are not qualified to interpret the results. This doesn't say how many people were involved, what the controls were, or how well-designed the study was overall. To me, stating "most infections occur from a single copy" is a profound claim and requires profound evidence. This is especially so given that the virus is fragile and prone to transcription errors, which would render many, many copies completely non-infectious.
